FE and PE Exam

Practice exam · 60 problems · 15 areas

FE Environmental practice exam, every step shown

60 problems from all 15 areas of the specification, in proportion to the published ranges. Most problems list what is given and what to find, and every solution opens step by step once you answer.

Updated Oct 29, 2026 · Not affiliated with NCEES.

How the set is built

Problems per area follow the midpoint of each published range, so the two largest areas, fluid mechanics and hydraulics and water and wastewater, get the most problems and the smallest areas get two or three. The shared-area problems (mathematics, statistics, ethics, economics) are a separate set from the ones on the FE practice test page and engineering economics, so working both pages gives you new problems. The area chips over problem 1 filter the set.

60 problems, every option explained

0 / 60 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 60 · Fundamental Principles · 7–11 items

Two aerated lagoons operate in series as completely mixed basins. The first holds 20,000 m3 and the second 10,000 m3; the flow is 2,000 m3/day, the influent BOD is 200 mg/L, and BOD removal is first order with k = 0.25 day−1 in both. What is the effluent BOD from the second lagoon?

Given
  • Lagoon 1 volume = 20,000 m3
  • Lagoon 2 volume = 10,000 m3
  • Flow Q = 2,000 m3/day
  • Influent BOD = 200 mg/L
  • Rate constant k = 0.25 day−1
FindEffluent BOD from lagoon 2 (mg/L)

Solution

Each completely mixed basin divides the concentration by (1 + kτ) (Fundamental principles: reactors in series).

τ1 = 20,000/2,000 = 10 day; τ2 = 10,000/2,000 = 5 day

C = 200/[(1 + 0.25 × 10)(1 + 0.25 × 5)] = 200/(3.5 × 2.25) = 25.4 mg/L

4.70 mg/L treats the 15 days of total detention as plug flow, e−0.25 × 15; the lagoons are completely mixed.
24.2 mg/L splits the 15 days evenly (7.5 days each); the lagoons have different volumes, 10 and 5 days.
τ1 = 20,000/2,000 = 10 d and τ2 = 5 d; C = 200/[(1 + 2.5)(1 + 1.25)] = 200/7.875 = 25.4 mg/L.
42.1 mg/L lumps both lagoons into one 15-day CSTR; splitting the volume into two mixed basins removes more.
57.1 mg/L stops after the first lagoon (200/3.5).
Question 2 of 60 · Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulics · 12–18 items

A cylindrical buoy with a diameter of 2 m and height of 1.5 m is floating in seawater (density = 1025 kg/m³). What is the mass of the buoy if it is floating with 0.5 m above the water surface?

Given
  • Buoy diameter D = 2 m
  • Buoy height H = 1.5 m
  • Seawater density ρ = 1025 kg/m3
  • Freeboard above water = 0.5 m
FindMass of the buoy m (kg)

Solution

A floating body displaces its own mass of fluid (Fluid mechanics: buoyancy).

Vdisp = π(1.0 m)2 × (1.5 − 0.5) m = 3.14 m3

m = ρV = 1,025 kg/m3 × 3.14 m3 = 3,220 kg

12,900 kg uses the 2 m diameter as the radius, which quadruples the area.
6,440 kg adds the 0.5 m freeboard to the 1.5 m height (2.0 m draft) instead of subtracting it.
4,830 kg uses the full 1.5 m height as if the buoy were completely submerged.
Draft = 1.0 m, displaced volume = π × 1.02 × 1.0 = 3.14 m3, and mass = 1,025 × 3.14 = 3,220 kg.
Question 3 of 60 · Mathematics · 5–8 items

A survey point in a local coordinate system has coordinates x = 40.00 m, y = 10.00 m. The local system is rotated 30° counterclockwise relative to the global North, and the local origin is located at global coordinates (100.00, 200.00) m. What are the coordinates of the point in the global system?

Given
  • Local coordinates x = 40.00 m, y = 10.00 m
  • Rotation = 30° counterclockwise
  • Local origin in global system = (100.00, 200.00) m
FindGlobal coordinates of the point (m)

Solution

Rotate the local coordinates by +30°, then translate by the local origin (Mathematics: coordinate transformation).

X = X0 + x cos θ − y sin θ = 100 + 34.64 − 5.00 = 129.6 m

Y = Y0 + x sin θ + y cos θ = 200 + 20.00 + 8.66 = 228.7 m

(29.6, 28.7) is the rotated point before the translation; the local origin (100.00, 200.00) still has to be added.
(140.0, 210.0) adds the translation but skips the rotation.
(139.6, 188.7) rotates clockwise (the sine terms with the opposite sign), the inverse of the stated rotation.
X = 100 + 40 cos 30° − 10 sin 30° = 129.6; Y = 200 + 40 sin 30° + 10 cos 30° = 228.7.
(111.3, 239.6) rotates by 60°, reading the 30° from the wrong reference axis.
Question 4 of 60 · Probability and Statistics · 4–6 items

An analyst is fitting a piecewise linear regression model that assumes the slope changes at a known breakpoint xb, while the left segment keeps the baseline slope β1 and the function stays continuous at xb. Which term must be added to the baseline model y = β0 + β1x? (I(·) is the indicator function.)

Solution

A linear spline (hinge) term (x − xb)+ changes the slope at xb while keeping continuity (Probability and statistics: regression).

A squared term bends the whole curve into a parabola; the model is no longer piecewise linear.
The hinge term is zero up to xb and grows as β2(x − xb) beyond it, so the slope becomes β1 + β2 with no jump at xb.
An indicator alone adds a step of β2 at xb: a jump in level, not a change in slope.
Without the indicator the term acts on both sides, changing the slope everywhere instead of only past xb.
This adds a global slope change plus a step, which breaks continuity at xb.
Question 5 of 60 · Ethics and Professional Practice · 5–8 items
TimeRelease Amount (lb)
08:00 (Day 1)30
14:00 (Day 1)40
20:00 (Day 1)20
02:00 (Day 2)20

A facility releases a substance with a Reportable Quantity (RQ) of 100 lb. Releases occur as shown in the log. At what time is the immediate notification requirement triggered?

Given
  • Reportable Quantity RQ = 100 lb
  • 08:00 (Day 1) release = 30 lb
  • 14:00 (Day 1) release = 40 lb
  • 20:00 (Day 1) release = 20 lb
  • 02:00 (Day 2) release = 20 lb
FindTime the notification requirement is triggered

Solution

A release of a reportable quantity or more within any 24-hour period requires immediate notification.

30 + 40 + 20 + 20 = 110 lb ≥ 100 lb within 18 h → notify at 02:00 Day 2

The 30 lb release at 08:00 is well below the 100 lb reportable quantity.
By 14:00 the cumulative release is 70 lb, still under 100 lb.
By 20:00 the total is 90 lb; the reportable quantity has not yet been reached.
The 02:00 release brings the total within 24 hours (since 08:00 Day 1) to 110 lb, at or above the 100 lb RQ, so notification is due then.
Releases are summed over any 24-hour period; 110 lb within 18 hours exceeds the RQ.
Question 6 of 60 · Ethics and Professional Practice · 5–8 items

A facility receives a Notice of Violation (NOV) requiring a response within 30 days. Which response strategy best satisfies regulatory requirements?

Solution

A notice of violation is answered with substance: cause, corrective action and a compliance schedule.

A bare promise lacks the root cause, corrective actions and dates that regulators expect.
An NOV response is expected to explain the cause, the corrective actions taken or planned, and a schedule to return to compliance.
Contesting alone, without addressing the conditions found, leaves the requested response unmet.
Waiting for another inspection lets the 30-day deadline pass with no response and the violation uncorrected.
Requesting a hearing does not supply the corrective-action plan the notice asks for, so the response would still be incomplete.
Question 7 of 60 · Engineering Economics · 5–8 items

A hazardous waste landfill requires a protective cap replacement every 15 years indefinitely. The first replacement will occur 15 years from today, and each replacement costs $250,000 at the time it occurs. At an interest rate of 5%, calculate the capitalized cost (present worth) of this replacement schedule.

Given
  • Replacement interval = 15 years, indefinitely
  • First replacement at year 15
  • Cost per replacement = $250,000
  • Interest rate i = 5%
FindCapitalized cost

Solution

Capitalized cost of a perpetual periodic cost: convert to an annual amount with (A/F), then divide by i (Engineering economics).

A = 250,000 × 0.05/[(1.05)15 − 1] = $11,586

P = A/i = 11,586/0.05 = $231,711

$5,000,000 divides the $250,000 by i as if it were spent every year.
A = 250,000 × (A/F, 5%, 15) = 250,000 × 0.05/(1.0515 − 1) = $11,586 per year; capitalized cost = A/i = $231,711.
$120,254 is the present worth of the first replacement only; the replacements continue forever.
$11,586 is the equivalent annual amount, F(A/F, 5%, 15); it still has to be capitalized by dividing by i.
$481,711 uses (A/P) instead of (A/F), which adds an immediate replacement at time zero.
Question 8 of 60 · Engineering Economics · 5–8 items

A small business repays a $20,000 environmental compliance loan over 5 years with equal monthly payments at a nominal annual interest rate of 12%, compounded monthly. What is the principal portion of the 20th payment?

Given
  • Loan = $20,000
  • Term = 5 years, equal monthly payments
  • Nominal rate = 12% per year compounded monthly
  • Payment number = 20
FindPrincipal portion of payment 20

Solution

Level-payment amortization: the principal share grows geometrically at the periodic rate (Engineering economics).

A = 20,000 × 0.01(1.01)60/[(1.01)60 − 1] = $444.89

principal20 = (444.89 − 200)(1.01)19 = $296

$445 is the whole monthly payment.
A = 20,000 × (A/P, 1%, 60) = $444.89; principal in payment k = (A − iP)(1 + i)k−1 = 244.89 × 1.0119 = $296.
$149 is the interest portion of payment 20, not the principal.
$333 is 20,000/60, a straight-line principal split; level-payment loans repay principal slowly at first.
$245 is the principal portion of the first payment; it grows by 1% each month.
Question 9 of 60 · Ethics and Professional Practice · 5–8 items

An engineer managing a site remediation project discovers a ruptured leachate collection pipe that is releasing untreated fluid into a local creek. The engineer's team stops the leak within minutes. According to standard professional and regulatory obligations, what is the engineer's immediate priority?

Solution

Release to the environment: report promptly to the authorities; analysis and paperwork follow (Ethics: public safety obligations).

Untreated leachate is known to be contaminated; waiting days for lab results delays the response.
A release of untreated leachate to surface water must be reported promptly; stopping the leak does not remove the duty to report, and protecting the public comes first.
An estimate is enough for the initial report; delaying notification to refine the volume defeats its purpose.
The duty to protect the public outranks the client's interest in controlling the message.
Root cause analysis follows later; it does not come before notification.
Question 10 of 60 · Fundamental Principles · 7–11 items

A water treatment plant has a maximum design capacity of 20 MGD and currently processes a maximum day demand of 12 MGD. The demand is projected to grow by 4.0% per year, compounded annually. After how many full years of growth will the demand first exceed the plant's design capacity?

Given
  • Plant capacity = 20 MGD
  • Current maximum day demand = 12 MGD
  • Growth rate = 4.0 %/yr
FindFull years until demand exceeds capacity

Solution

Solve the compound-growth equation, then take the first full year past capacity.

12 × (1.04)t = 20 → t = ln(1.667)/ln(1.04) = 13.02 years

year 13: 19.98 MGD; year 14: 20.78 MGD > 20 MGD

12 years treats 4.0% as a continuous rate and truncates t = ln(1.667)/0.04 = 12.8; the growth here is compounded annually.
13 years rounds t = 13.02 down; after 13 years demand is 19.98 MGD, still below 20 MGD.
(1.04)t = 20/12 gives t = 13.02, so demand first exceeds 20 MGD after 14 full years (20.78 MGD).
16 years assumes linear growth of 0.48 MGD per year and truncates 16.7; the growth is compound.
17 years is the first full year above capacity under linear growth, 0.48 MGD per year, not compound growth.
Question 11 of 60 · Environmental Chemistry · 7–11 items

A reaction rate constant k is determined to be 1.5 d−1 at 25°C. If the activation energy Ea is 50 kJ/mol, what is the estimated rate constant at 35°C? (Universal Gas Constant R = 8.314 J mol−1 K−1)

Given
  • Rate constant k1 = 1.5 d−1 at 25 °C
  • New temperature = 35 °C
  • Activation energy Ea = 50 kJ/mol
  • R = 8.314 J/(mol·K)
FindRate constant at 35 °C (d−1)

Solution

Two-temperature Arrhenius equation with absolute temperatures (Chemistry: reaction rate).

ln(k2/k1) = (Ea/R)(1/T1 − 1/T2) = (50,000/8.314)(1/298.15 − 1/308.15) = 0.655

k2 = 1.5 d−1 × e0.655 = 2.9 d−1

0.8 d−1 comes from flipping the sign of the exponent; a higher temperature raises k when Ea is positive.
1.5 d−1 enters Ea as 50 (kJ) with R in J/(mol·K), so the exponent is about 1,000 times too small and k barely changes.
ln(k2/k1) = (50,000/8.314)(1/298.15 − 1/308.15) = 0.655, so k2 = 1.5 × e0.655 = 2.9 d−1.
6.8 d−1 uses 100.655 instead of e0.655, treating the natural-log Arrhenius form as base 10.
23.2 d−1 uses R = 1.987 cal/(mol·K) with Ea in joules, which makes the exponent 4.2 times too large.
Question 12 of 60 · Health Hazards and Risk Assessment · 4–6 items

A risk assessment determines a No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) of 100 mg/kg-day for a chemical. The Estimated Exposure Dose (EED) for the population is 0.5 mg/kg-day. The derivation of the Reference Dose requires a standard uncertainty factor of 100 (10 for interspecies and 10 for intraspecies). Calculate the Margin of Exposure (MOE) and determine if the risk is considered acceptable.

Given
  • NOAEL = 100 mg/(kg·d)
  • Estimated exposure dose = 0.5 mg/(kg·d)
  • Uncertainty factor = 100
FindMOE and acceptability

Solution

Margin of exposure = NOAEL ÷ exposure, compared with the combined uncertainty factor (Health hazards: risk characterization).

MOE = 100/0.5 = 200 > 100 → acceptable

0.005 inverts the ratio (exposure/NOAEL); the MOE puts the NOAEL in the numerator.
MOE = NOAEL/exposure = 100/0.5 = 200, which exceeds the required margin of 100 (the combined uncertainty factor), so the risk is acceptable.
200 is the right MOE, but a margin above the 100 benchmark means adequate protection, not unacceptable risk.
1.0 mg/kg-day is NOAEL/UF, the reference dose, not the margin of exposure.
0.005 is the inverted ratio, and comparing it with 100 then gives the wrong verdict as well.
Question 13 of 60 · Health Hazards and Risk Assessment · 4–6 items

The inhalation unit risk for a contaminant is 4.0 × 10−6 (µg/m3)−1. Assuming a standard adult body weight of 70 kg and an inhalation rate of 20 m3/day, calculate the corresponding slope factor in (mg/kg-day)−1.

Given
  • Inhalation unit risk = 4.0 × 10−6 (μg/m3)−1
  • Body weight BW = 70 kg
  • Inhalation rate IR = 20 m3/day
FindSlope factor ((mg/kg-day)−1)

Solution

Unit risk per µg/m3 → slope factor per mg/kg-day (Health hazards: dose-response).

SF = UR × BW/IR × 1,000 µg/mg = 4.0 × 10−6 × (70/20) × 1,000 = 1.4 × 10−2 (mg/kg-day)−1

1.4 × 10−5 leaves out the 1,000 µg/mg conversion.
1.1 × 10−3 inverts the body-weight and inhalation-rate ratio (IR/BW instead of BW/IR).
4.0 × 10−3 converts µg to mg but leaves out the BW/IR ratio of 3.5.
SF = UR × BW/IR × 1,000 µg/mg = 4.0 × 10−6 × 70/20 × 1,000 = 1.4 × 10−2 (mg/kg-day)−1.
1.4 × 101 converts µg to mg with 106 instead of 103.
Question 14 of 60 · Environmental Chemistry · 7–11 items

A closed system at 25°C (298 K) contains 100 m³ of air and 10 m³ of water. A volatile organic compound with a Henry's law constant of 2.0 × 10−3 atm m3 mol−1 is introduced into the system. Assuming equilibrium is reached, calculate the mass fraction of the contaminant in the air phase. Use R = 8.206 × 10−5 atm · m3 mol−1 K−1.

Given
  • Temperature = 25 °C (298 K)
  • Air volume = 100 m3
  • Water volume = 10 m3
  • Henry's constant H = 2.0 × 10−3 atm·m3/mol
  • R = 8.206 × 10−5 atm·m3/(mol·K)
FindMass fraction in air

Solution

Mass in each phase = concentration × volume; at equilibrium Cair = H′·Cwater with H′ = H/RT.

H′ = 2.0 × 10−3 ÷ (8.206 × 10−5 × 298) = 0.0818

fair = H′Va/(H′Va + Vw) = 8.18/(8.18 + 10) = 0.45

H′ = H/RT = 0.0818; air holds 0.0818 × 100 = 8.18 units per 10 in water, so the air fraction is 8.18/18.18 = 0.45.
0.55 is the fraction left in the water phase, not in air.
0.82 divides the air term (8.18) by the water term (10) alone instead of by the total 18.18.
0.91 uses T = 25 instead of 298 K in RT, which makes the dimensionless constant about 12 times too large.
0.99 inverts the dimensionless constant (RT/H = 12.2), which puts nearly everything in the air.
Question 15 of 60 · Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulics · 12–18 items

Air flows through a rectangular HVAC duct with dimensions 2.0 m wide by 1.0 m high. Calculate the hydraulic diameter Dh to be used for Reynolds number and friction loss calculations.

Given
  • Duct width = 2.0 m
  • Duct height = 1.0 m
FindHydraulic diameter Dh (m)

Solution

Noncircular conduits use the hydraulic diameter in Re and Darcy–Weisbach (Fluid mechanics: noncircular conduits).

Dh = 4A/P = 4(2.0 m × 1.0 m)/(2 × 3.0 m) = 1.33 m

0.33 m is the hydraulic radius A/P; the hydraulic diameter is four times that.
0.67 m uses 2A/P; the definition is 4A/P.
Dh = 4A/P = 4 × (2.0 × 1.0)/[2 × (2.0 + 1.0)] = 8/6 = 1.33 m.
1.50 m averages the width and height, which is not how Dh is defined.
2.00 m is the duct width; the short side controls the shear more than that.
Question 16 of 60 · Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulics · 12–18 items

A fully submerged wooden log (SG = 0.65) with a volume of 0.8 m3 is tethered to the bottom of a lake. Calculate the tension in the tether.

Given
  • Log specific gravity SG = 0.65
  • Log volume V = 0.8 m3
FindTether tension (kN)

Solution

Vertical equilibrium of the submerged log: buoyancy up, weight and tether tension down (Fluid mechanics: buoyancy).

B = γwV = 9.81 × 0.8 = 7.85 kN; W = 0.65 × 7.85 = 5.10 kN

T = B − W = 2.75 kN

Buoyancy 9.81 × 0.8 = 7.85 kN, weight 0.65 × 7.85 = 5.10 kN, so the tether holds 7.85 − 5.10 = 2.75 kN.
5.10 kN is the log's weight, not the net upward force the tether resists.
7.33 kN leaves the unit weight of water out of the log's weight only (0.65 × 0.8 = 0.52) and subtracts that from the 7.85 kN buoyancy.
7.85 kN is the buoyant force alone; the log's weight offsets part of it.
12.9 kN adds buoyancy and weight; they act in opposite directions.
Question 17 of 60 · Thermodynamics · 3–5 items

A vertical plate (A = 2.00 m2) at 80 °C faces surroundings at 20 °C. The surface emissivity is ε = 0.85, and the convective coefficient is h = 12 W/(m2·K). Compute the total heat loss by radiation and convection.

Given
  • Plate area A = 2.00 m2
  • Surface temperature = 80 °C
  • Surroundings = 20 °C
  • Emissivity ε = 0.85
  • Convective coefficient h = 12 W/(m2·K)
FindTotal heat loss (kW)

Solution

Convection plus radiation to large surroundings, temperatures in kelvin for radiation (Heat transfer: radiation).

qconv = hAΔT = 12 × 2.00 × 60 = 1,440 W

qrad = εσA(Ts4 − Tsur4) = 0.85 × 5.67 × 10−8 × 2.00 × (353.154 − 293.154) = 787 W

q = 2.23 kW

0.787 kW is the radiation loss alone; convection adds 1.44 kW.
1.11 kW leaves the 2.00 m2 area out of both terms (720 W convection + 394 W radiation).
1.44 kW is convection alone (or radiation with temperatures in °C, which makes it negligible); radiation needs kelvin.
1.51 kW drops the 2.00 m2 area from the convection term (12 × 60 W).
Convection = 12 × 2.00 × 60 = 1,440 W; radiation = 0.85 × 5.67 × 10−8 × 2.00 × (353.154 − 293.154) = 787 W; total = 2.23 kW.
Question 18 of 60 · Thermodynamics · 3–5 items

A closed system contains an ideal gas at 1.00 atm and 25.0 °C with a volume of 10.0 L. It is compressed reversibly and isothermally to 2.50 L. Calculate the work done by the gas. Use 1 L·atm = 101.325 J.

Given
  • Initial pressure P1 = 1.00 atm
  • Temperature = 25.0 °C
  • Initial volume V1 = 10.0 L
  • Final volume V2 = 2.50 L
  • 1 L·atm = 101.325 J
FindWork done by the gas (kJ)

Solution

Reversible isothermal work for an ideal gas (Thermodynamics: closed systems).

W = P1V1ln(V2/V1) = (1.00 atm × 10.0 L) × ln(2.50/10.0) = −13.9 L·atm

W = −13.9 × 101.325 J = −1.40 kJ

−3.04 kJ uses the final pressure, 4.00 atm, times ΔV, as if the gas were compressed at constant pressure.
Wby gas = P1V1ln(V2/V1) = 10.0 L·atm × ln(0.25) = −13.9 L·atm × 101.325 J/(L·atm) = −1.40 kJ.
−0.610 kJ uses log10 instead of the natural log.
+1.40 kJ is the work done on the gas; work done by a gas being compressed is negative.
−0.760 kJ uses P1(V2 − V1), the constant-pressure work; an isothermal path needs the logarithm.
Question 19 of 60 · Surface Water Resources and Hydrology · 9–14 items
SegmentLength (m)Slope (m/m)Manning nDepth (m)
Sheet flow400.0100.0150.002
Shallow concentrated1500.0200.0300.050
Defined channel (rectangular)12000.0010.0351.20

Compute the total time of concentration (Tc) in minutes for the three flow segments in the table. Use Manning's equation, v = (1/n)R2/3S1/2 (SI), and assume R ≈ depth for the sheet and shallow concentrated flow. The rectangular channel has a 3.0 m bottom width and vertical sides. Report Tc to one decimal place.

Given
  • Sheet flow: L = 40 m, S = 0.010, n = 0.015, depth 0.002 m
  • Shallow concentrated: L = 150 m, S = 0.020, n = 0.030, depth 0.050 m
  • Channel: L = 1,200 m, S = 0.001, n = 0.035, depth 1.20 m, width 3.0 m
FindTime of concentration Tc (min)

Solution

Tc is the sum of segment travel times L/v, with v from Manning's equation (Hydrology: time of concentration).

sheet: v = (1/0.015)(0.002)2/3(0.010)1/2 = 0.106 m/s → 40/0.106 = 378 s = 6.3 min

shallow: v = (1/0.030)(0.050)2/3(0.020)1/2 = 0.640 m/s → 150/0.640 = 234 s = 3.9 min

channel: R = (3.0 × 1.20)/(3.0 + 2 × 1.20) = 0.667 m; v = 0.690 m/s → 1,200/0.690 = 1,740 s = 29.0 min

Tc = 6.3 + 3.9 + 29.0 = 39.2 min

26.3 minutes applies the US customary 1.49 factor in Manning's equation with SI lengths, so every velocity is 49% too high.
29.8 minutes uses the 1.20 m depth as R in the channel; for a 3.0 m wide channel R = A/P = 3.6/5.4 = 0.667 m.
32.9 minutes leaves out the 6.3-minute sheet-flow segment; Tc is the sum of all three travel times.
35.3 minutes leaves out the 3.9-minute shallow concentrated flow segment.
Travel times are 6.3 (sheet, v = 0.106 m/s) + 3.9 (shallow, v = 0.640 m/s) + 29.0 (channel, R = 0.667 m, v = 0.690 m/s) = 39.2 minutes.
Question 20 of 60 · Surface Water Resources and Hydrology · 9–14 items

Calculate the Muskingum routing coefficient C1 for a river reach with travel time K = 4 hours, weighting factor x = 0.2, and a routing time step Δt = 2 hours. The Muskingum equation is Ot+1 = C0 It+1 + C1 It + C2 Ot.

Given
  • Travel time K = 4 h
  • Weighting factor x = 0.2
  • Time step Δt = 2 h
FindMuskingum coefficient C1

Solution

Muskingum coefficients share one denominator and sum to 1 (Hydrology: flood routing).

D = K − Kx + 0.5Δt = 4 − 0.8 + 1.0 = 4.2 h

C1 = (Kx + 0.5Δt)/D = 1.8/4.2 = 0.429 (C0 = 0.048, C2 = 0.524, sum = 1)

0.048 is C0 = (0.5Δt − Kx)/D, the coefficient on the current inflow It+1.
0.360 leaves −Kx out of the denominator (1.8/5.0); the shared denominator is K − Kx + 0.5Δt = 4.2 h.
C1 = (Kx + 0.5Δt)/(K − Kx + 0.5Δt) = (0.8 + 1.0)/(4 − 0.8 + 1.0) = 1.8/4.2 = 0.429.
0.524 is C2 = (K − Kx − 0.5Δt)/D, the coefficient on the previous outflow Ot.
0.538 uses the full Δt instead of Δt/2 in both terms (2.8/5.2).
Question 21 of 60 · Surface Water Resources and Hydrology · 9–14 items

A hydrologist is modeling a river reach that consists of a deep main channel and wide, shallow floodplains. When flows exceed bankfull stage, the hydraulic properties change drastically. Which limitation makes the standard fixed-parameter Muskingum method unsuitable for this specific scenario?

Solution

Fixed K and x assume a constant wave celerity; overbank flow onto wide floodplains changes celerity with stage, so the parameters must vary (Hydrology: flood routing).

The opposite holds: Δt should not exceed about K (2Kx ≤ Δt ≤ 2K(1 − x)) to keep the coefficients positive.
Muskingum works on storage–flow relations and has no cross-section shape requirement.
Muskingum attenuates through its storage terms; with valid coefficients it is stable, and diffusion is not the floodplain problem.
When flow spreads onto wide, shallow floodplains the wave celerity drops sharply, so a single fixed K (and x) cannot describe both in-bank and overbank flow.
Storage is exactly what Muskingum represents, as prism storage KO plus wedge storage Kx(I − O).
Question 22 of 60 · Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulics · 12–18 items

A 300 mm diameter PVC pipe (E = 2.8 GPa) with a wall thickness of 15 mm carries water (K = 2.2 GPa). If the velocity drops instantaneously by 1.0 m/s, what is the approximate maximum pressure surge? Assume water density is 1,000 kg/m3.

Given
  • Pipe diameter D = 300 mm
  • Pipe modulus E = 2.8 GPa
  • Wall thickness e = 15 mm
  • Water bulk modulus K = 2.2 GPa
  • Velocity change ΔV = 1.0 m/s
  • Density ρ = 1,000 kg/m3
FindMaximum pressure surge (kPa)

Solution

Wave celerity in an elastic pipe, then Joukowsky (Fluid mechanics: water hammer).

a = √{(2.2 × 109/1,000)/[1 + (2.2/2.8)(300/15)]} = 363 m/s

Δp = ρaΔV = 1,000 kg/m3 × 363 m/s × 1.0 m/s = 363 kPa

a = √[(K/ρ)/(1 + (K/E)(D/e))] = √[2.2 × 106/(1 + 0.786 × 20)] = 363 m/s, so Δp = ρaΔV = 1,000 × 363 × 1.0 = 363 kPa.
726 kPa doubles the Joukowsky rise; ρaΔV is already the full surge for an instantaneous change.
1,110 kPa leaves the D/e factor out of the wall term, so the PVC wall looks far stiffer than it is.
1,480 kPa uses the celerity in a rigid pipe, √(K/ρ); a PVC wall stretches and slows the wave.
1,670 kPa takes the celerity as √(E/ρ) using the pipe modulus instead of the water's bulk modulus.
Question 23 of 60 · Surface Water Resources and Hydrology · 9–14 items

A stream with a flow of 8.0 m3/s, DO of 8.5 mg/L, and BOD of 2.0 mg/L mixes with a wastewater discharge of 2.0 m3/s, DO of 1.0 mg/L, and BOD of 100 mg/L. The saturation DO is 10.0 mg/L. The deoxygenation rate (k1) is 0.2 day−1 and the reaeration rate (k2) is 0.4 day−1. What is the DO deficit 2.0 days downstream?

Given
  • Stream: Q = 8.0 m3/s, DO = 8.5 mg/L, BOD = 2.0 mg/L
  • Wastewater: Q = 2.0 m3/s, DO = 1.0 mg/L, BOD = 100 mg/L
  • Saturation DO = 10.0 mg/L
  • Deoxygenation rate k1 = 0.2 day−1
  • Reaeration rate k2 = 0.4 day−1
  • Travel time t = 2.0 days
FindDO deficit (mg/L)

Solution

Mix first, then apply Streeter–Phelps (Surface water: DO sag).

DOmix = (8.0 × 8.5 + 2.0 × 1.0)/10 = 7.0 mg/L → Da = 3.0 mg/L; La = (8.0 × 2.0 + 2.0 × 100)/10 = 21.6 mg/L

Dt = [k1La/(k2 − k1)](e−k1t − e−k2t) + Dae−k2t

D2 = 21.6 × (0.670 − 0.449) + 3.0 × 0.449 = 6.1 mg/L

Mixed DO 7.0 mg/L (Da = 3.0), mixed BOD 21.6 mg/L; D = (0.2 × 21.6/0.2)(e−0.4 − e−0.8) + 3.0e−0.8 = 4.77 + 1.35 = 6.1 mg/L.
7.8 mg/L adds the initial 3.0 mg/L deficit without letting it decay by e−k2t.
8.8 mg/L takes the initial deficit from the wastewater DO alone (10.0 − 1.0 = 9.0 mg/L) instead of the mixed 7.0 mg/L.
11.6 mg/L swaps k1 and k2 in the Streeter–Phelps equation.
23.4 mg/L uses the undiluted 100 mg/L wastewater BOD instead of the mixed 21.6 mg/L.
Question 24 of 60 · Groundwater, Soils, and Sediments · 8–12 items

A homogeneous horizontal aquifer has hydraulic conductivity K = 10 m/day, hydraulic gradient i = 0.002, and effective porosity ne = 0.25. A sorbing contaminant with retardation factor R = 5 originates 500 m upgradient. Estimate the travel time to the receptor (days).

Given
  • Hydraulic conductivity K = 10 m/day
  • Hydraulic gradient i = 0.002
  • Effective porosity ne = 0.25
  • Retardation factor R = 5
  • Travel distance L = 500 m
FindContaminant travel time (days)

Solution

Retarded travel time (Groundwater: contaminant transport).

v = Ki/ne = (10 × 0.002)/0.25 = 0.08 m/day; vc = v/R = 0.08/5 = 0.016 m/day

t = L/vc = 500 m ÷ 0.016 m/day = 31,250 days

1,250 days multiplies the seepage velocity by R instead of dividing; sorption slows the contaminant.
6,250 days is the travel time of the water itself (v = 0.08 m/day) with no retardation.
25,000 days uses the Darcy flux (0.02 m/day) and no retardation.
v = Ki/ne = 10 × 0.002/0.25 = 0.08 m/day, vc = v/R = 0.016 m/day, t = 500/0.016 = 31,250 days.
125,000 days applies R to the Darcy flux instead of the seepage velocity.
Question 25 of 60 · Fundamental Principles · 7–11 items

A Continuous Stirred-Tank Reactor (CSTR) is designed to treat wastewater with a flow rate of 500 m3/d. The pollutant decays via first-order kinetics with a rate constant k = 4.0 d−1. What reactor volume is required to achieve 80% removal efficiency?

Given
  • Flow Q = 500 m3/d
  • Rate constant k = 4.0 d−1
  • Required removal = 80 %
FindRequired CSTR volume (m3)

Solution

CSTR with first-order decay (Fundamental principles: reactor design).

C/C0 = 1/(1 + kτ) → 0.20 = 1/(1 + 4.0τ) → τ = 1.0 d

V = Qτ = 500 m3/d × 1.0 d = 500 m3

125 m3 is Q/k alone; the removal target, (Cin/Cout − 1) = 4, never enters.
201 m3 uses the plug-flow equation τ = ln(5)/k = 0.40 d; the reactor is a CSTR.
Cout/Cin = 0.20 = 1/(1 + 4.0τ) gives τ = 1.0 d, so V = 500 m3/d × 1.0 d = 500 m3.
625 m3 uses τ = (Cin/Cout)/k = 1.25 d and forgets to subtract 1.
2,000 m3 uses kτ = 4 as if τ were 4 days, without dividing by k = 4.0 d−1.
Question 26 of 60 · Water and Wastewater · 12–18 items

A wastewater treatment plant operates a centrifuge for sludge dewatering. The unit receives a feed sludge flow of 25 m3/hr with a solids concentration of 3.0% (assume specific gravity of 1.0). The centrifuge operates with a solids capture efficiency of 95% and produces a dewatered cake with 22% solids. Calculate the mass loading of dry solids returning to the headworks in the centrate stream.

Given
  • Feed sludge flow = 25 m3/hr
  • Feed solids = 3.0%
  • Specific gravity = 1.0
  • Solids capture = 95%
  • Cake solids = 22%
FindDry solids in centrate (kg/hr)

Solution

Solids capture splits the feed solids between cake and centrate (Water and wastewater: sludge dewatering).

Mfeed = 25 m3/hr × 1,000 kg/m3 × 0.030 = 750 kg/hr

Mcentrate = 750 × (1 − 0.95) = 37.5 kg/hr

3,240 kg/hr is the wet cake mass (713/0.22), not dry solids in the centrate.
750 kg/hr is the total dry solids fed to the centrifuge.
713 kg/hr is the dry solids captured in the cake (750 × 0.95), not the solids in the centrate.
165 kg/hr applies the 22% cake solids fraction to the feed; cake dryness says nothing about how much solids escape.
Feed solids = 25 m3/hr × 1,000 kg/m3 × 0.030 = 750 kg/hr; 95% capture leaves 5% in the centrate, 750 × 0.05 = 37.5 kg/hr.
Question 27 of 60 · Water and Wastewater · 12–18 items

An anaerobic digester treats 100 m3/d of primary sludge with 5.0% total solids (TS), of which 75% are volatile solids (VS). The digester achieves 60% VS destruction. The specific methane yield is 0.50 m3 CH4 per kg VS destroyed. If the lower heating value of methane is 35.8 MJ m−3 and the cogeneration system has an electrical efficiency of 35%, estimate the daily electricity generation.

Given
  • Sludge flow = 100 m3/d
  • Total solids = 5.0 %
  • Volatile fraction = 75 %
  • VS destruction = 60 %
  • Methane yield = 0.50 m3 CH4/kg VS destroyed
  • Methane LHV = 35.8 MJ/m3
  • Electrical efficiency = 35 %
FindDaily electricity generation (kWh/d)

Solution

VS fed → VS destroyed → methane volume → electrical energy (Water and wastewater: anaerobic digestion).

VSdestroyed = 100 m3/d × 1,000 kg/m3 × 0.05 × 0.75 × 0.60 = 2,250 kg/d

CH4 = 2,250 × 0.50 = 1,125 m3/d

E = 1,125 m3/d × 35.8 MJ/m3 × 0.35 ÷ 3.6 MJ/kWh = 3,916 kWh/d

1,370 kWh/d applies the 35% electrical efficiency twice.
2,349 kWh/d applies the 60% VS destruction twice.
VS = 100 × 1,000 × 0.05 × 0.75 = 3,750 kg/d; destroyed 2,250 kg/d; CH4 = 1,125 m3/d; 1,125 × 35.8 × 0.35/3.6 = 3,916 kWh/d.
6,526 kWh/d uses all 3,750 kg/d of VS fed instead of the 60% destroyed.
11,188 kWh/d is the full heating value of the methane (100% conversion), before the 35% electrical efficiency.
Question 28 of 60 · Water and Wastewater · 12–18 items

A rainwater harvesting system utilizes a catchment area of 200 m2 with a runoff coefficient of 0.90. During a storm event with a precipitation depth of 50 mm, a first-flush diverter removes the initial 200 L of runoff before water enters the storage tank. What is the net volume of water captured?

Given
  • Catchment area = 200 m2
  • Runoff coefficient = 0.90
  • Precipitation depth = 50 mm
  • First-flush diversion = 200 L
FindNet captured volume (L)

Solution

Captured volume = area × depth × runoff coefficient − first flush (Water resources: rainwater harvesting).

V = 200 m2 × 0.050 m × 0.90 = 9.0 m3 = 9,000 L

Vnet = 9,000 − 200 = 8,800 L

Runoff = 200 m2 × 0.050 m × 0.90 = 9.0 m3 = 9,000 L; minus the 200 L first flush = 8,800 L.
9,000 L is the runoff before the 200 L first-flush diversion.
9,200 L adds the 200 L first flush to the runoff instead of diverting it.
9,800 L subtracts the first flush but uses a runoff coefficient of 1.0.
10,000 L is the rain falling on the roof, with no runoff coefficient and no first flush.
Question 29 of 60 · Water and Wastewater · 12–18 items

A plant must reduce influent NO3-N from 21.0 mg/L to 1.0 mg/L by denitrification. Readily biodegradable internal COD available is 30.0 mg/L. The theoretical COD demand for nitrate reduction is 2.86 kg COD per kg NO3-N reduced. What supplemental COD (mg/L) is required?

Given
  • Influent NO3-N = 21.0 mg/L
  • Effluent NO3-N = 1.0 mg/L
  • Available internal COD = 30.0 mg/L
  • COD demand = 2.86 kg COD/kg NO3-N
FindSupplemental COD (mg/L)

Solution

Denitrification COD demand minus the internal COD (Water and wastewater: nitrogen removal).

CODreq = (21.0 − 1.0) mg N/L × 2.86 = 57.2 mg/L

CODsupp = 57.2 − 30.0 = 27.2 mg/L

87.2 mg/L adds the available COD to the demand instead of subtracting it.
61.4 mg/L uses 4.57, the oxygen demand of nitrification, instead of 2.86 g COD per g NO3-N for denitrification.
57.2 mg/L is the total COD demand; the 30.0 mg/L already available reduces what must be added.
30.1 mg/L uses all 21.0 mg/L of nitrate; the effluent may keep 1.0 mg/L.
Nitrate removed = 21.0 − 1.0 = 20.0 mg N/L; COD needed = 20.0 × 2.86 = 57.2 mg/L; supplement = 57.2 − 30.0 = 27.2 mg/L.
Question 30 of 60 · Water and Wastewater · 12–18 items

An MBR must treat an average dry weather flow of 6,000 m3/day. The design uses a sustainable flux Js = 20 L/(m2·hr) and a short-term maximum flux Jmax = 40 L/(m2·hr) for peak flows up to 3× average. Determine the membrane area (m2) required by the governing condition.

Given
  • Average flow Qavg = 6000 m3/day
  • Sustainable flux Js = 20 L/(m2·hr)
  • Maximum flux Jmax = 40 L/(m2·hr)
  • Peak flow = 3 × average
FindGoverning membrane area (m2)

Solution

Check each flow condition against its allowed flux; the larger area governs (Water and wastewater: membranes).

average: 6,000 m3/day = 250,000 L/hr → 250,000/20 = 12,500 m2

peak: 3 × 250,000 = 750,000 L/hr → 750,000/40 = 18,750 m2 (governs)

6,250 m2 sizes the average flow at the short-term maximum flux; Jmax is allowed only during peaks.
12,500 m2 covers average flow at the sustainable flux, but the 3× peak at 40 LMH needs more.
Average: 250,000 L/hr ÷ 20 = 12,500 m2; peak: 750,000 L/hr ÷ 40 = 18,750 m2. The peak case governs.
37,500 m2 holds the peak flow to the sustainable flux; peaks may run at Jmax.
300,000 m2 divides L/day by a flux in L/(m2·hr) without converting days to hours.
Question 31 of 60 · Water and Wastewater · 12–18 items

A plant with flow 5000 m3/day has influent total phosphorus 6.0 mg/L (30 kg P/day). Net waste activated sludge production is 500 kg VSS/day. Biomass P content is 0.02 kg P per kg VSS. Calculate the daily phosphorus that must be removed chemically (kg P/day) after biological uptake.

Given
  • Flow = 5000 m3/day
  • Influent TP = 6.0 mg/L
  • Net WAS production = 500 kg VSS/day
  • Biomass P content = 0.02 kg P/kg VSS
FindPhosphorus to remove chemically (kg P/day)

Solution

Phosphorus balance (Water and wastewater: nutrient removal).

Pin = 5,000 m3/day × 6.0 g/m3 = 30 kg/day

Pbio = 500 kg VSS/day × 0.02 = 10 kg/day → Pchem = 30 − 10 = 20 kg/day

0 assumes biological uptake removes all the phosphorus; at 0.02 kg P/kg VSS the sludge takes up only 10 kg/day.
6 is the influent concentration in mg/L, not a load.
10 kg P/day is the phosphorus leaving in the waste sludge, not what remains for chemical removal.
Influent load = 5,000 m3/day × 6.0 g/m3 = 30 kg/day; biological uptake = 500 × 0.02 = 10 kg/day; chemical removal = 20 kg P/day.
30 kg P/day is the whole influent load, ignoring the 10 kg/day taken up by biomass.
Question 32 of 60 · Groundwater, Soils, and Sediments · 8–12 items

A contaminant plume is migrating through a confined aquifer composed of fine sand. The hydraulic conductivity (K) is 5.0 × 10−4 cm/s, the hydraulic gradient (i) is 0.01, and the effective porosity (ne) is 0.25. Based on the average linear velocity, how much time is required for the center of mass of a conservative tracer to travel 1.5 km?

Given
  • Hydraulic conductivity K = 5.0 × 10−4 cm/s
  • Hydraulic gradient i = 0.01
  • Effective porosity ne = 0.25
  • Travel distance = 1.5 km
FindTravel time of the center of mass (yr)

Solution

Travel time at the average linear velocity (Groundwater: Darcy's law).

v = Ki/ne = (5.0 × 10−4 cm/s × 0.01)/0.25 = 2.0 × 10−5 cm/s = 6.31 m/yr

t = 1,500 m ÷ 6.31 m/yr = 238 yr

q = Ki = 5.0 × 10−6 cm/s, v = q/ne = 2.0 × 10−5 cm/s = 6.31 m/yr, t = 1,500/6.31 = 238 yr.
951 yr uses the Darcy flux as the travel velocity, ignoring the effective porosity.
2,380 yr converts cm/s to m/s with 1/1,000 instead of 1/100, making the velocity ten times too small.
3,800 yr multiplies the Darcy flux by ne instead of dividing.
14,300 yr converts with 525,600 s per year (the number of minutes); a year has 3.16 × 107 s.
Question 33 of 60 · Energy and Environment · 4–6 items

An 800-MW nuclear power plant operates with a heat rate of 10,400 Btu/kWh. What is the approximate rate of waste heat rejection to the environment in MW?

Given
  • Plant output = 800 MW
  • Heat rate = 10,400 Btu/kWh
FindWaste heat rejected (MW)

Solution

Heat rate gives the thermal input; waste heat = input − electrical output (Energy and environment: power plants).

Qin = 800 MW × 10,400/3,412 = 2,440 MW

Qrejected = 2,440 − 800 = 1,640 MW

538 MW multiplies the electrical output by (1 − η); the rejected heat is the input minus the output.
800 MW is the electrical output, not the heat rejected.
Heat input = 800 × 10,400/3,412 = 2,440 MWth; rejected = 2,440 − 800 = 1,640 MW.
2,440 MW is the total thermal input; 800 MW of it leaves as electricity.
3,240 MW adds the output to the input instead of subtracting it.
Question 34 of 60 · Energy and Environment · 4–6 items

A proposed 100 MW wind farm has an expected service life of 20 years and a capacity factor of 30%. The embodied (construction) carbon intensity is 1,500 kg CO2e/kW installed. Operational maintenance emissions are estimated at 5 g CO2e/kWh. What is the total estimated lifetime carbon footprint of the facility in metric tons CO2e?

Given
  • Capacity = 100 MW
  • Service life = 20 yr
  • Capacity factor = 30 %
  • Embodied intensity = 1,500 kg CO2e/kW
  • Operational emissions = 5 g CO2e/kWh
FindLifetime carbon footprint (t CO2e)

Solution

Lifetime footprint = embodied + operational emissions (Energy and environment: life-cycle assessment).

embodied = 100,000 kW × 1,500 kg/kW = 1.5 × 108 kg = 150,000 t

operational = 100,000 kW × 0.30 × 8,760 h × 20 yr × 5 g/kWh = 26,280 t

total = 176,280 metric tons CO2e

Embodied: 100,000 kW × 1,500 kg = 150,000 t; operational: 100 MW × 0.30 × 8,760 × 20 = 5.256 × 109 kWh × 5 g = 26,280 t; total 176,280 metric tons.
150,000 metric tons is the embodied (construction) share alone.
176,280,000 is the footprint in kilograms labeled as metric tons.
26,280 metric tons is the operational share alone; construction adds 150,000 metric tons.
237,600 metric tons ignores the 30% capacity factor, as if the turbines ran at full output all year.
Question 35 of 60 · Solid and Hazardous Waste · 7–11 items

A landfill cell has a covered area of 40,000 m2. Using the monthly climate data below, compute the annual volume of water that percolates to the liner with a month-by-month balance: infiltration = max(0, P − ET) × (1 − runoff coefficient), then convert millimeters to cubic meters.

MonthPrecip (mm)ET (mm)Runoff coeff
Jan40100.10
Feb35150.10
Mar45250.12
Apr50400.15
May60500.20
Jun70600.25
Jul80700.30
Aug90700.30
Sep70500.25
Oct40300.15
Nov40150.12
Dec4050.10
Given
  • Cell area = 40,000 m2
  • Monthly P, ET and runoff coefficient as tabulated
FindAnnual percolation to the liner (m3/yr)

Solution

Monthly water balance on the cover, summed over the year (Solid waste: landfill leachate).

Imonth = max(0, P − ET)(1 − C): 27 + 18 + 17.6 + 8.5 + 8 + 7.5 + 7 + 14 + 15 + 8.5 + 22 + 31.5 = 184.6 mm

V = 0.1846 m × 40,000 m2 = 7,380 m3/yr

7,380,000 multiplies millimeters by square meters without converting mm to m.
73,800 m3/yr divides millimeters by 100 instead of 1,000 when converting to meters.
21,100 m3/yr removes runoff but never subtracts evapotranspiration.
8,800 m3/yr uses the full surplus P − ET (220 mm) and ignores the runoff coefficient.
Monthly infiltration max(0, P − ET)(1 − C) sums to 184.6 mm; 0.1846 m × 40,000 m2 = 7,380 m3/yr.
Question 36 of 60 · Solid and Hazardous Waste · 7–11 items

A geonet leachate drainage layer has a transmissivity θ = 2.5 × 10−4 m2/s on a slope of 0.5% (i = 0.005); a combined clogging and creep reduction factor of 0.60 applies. The design leachate impingement rate is 2.0 mm/day (0.0020 m3/day per m2 of liner). If all leachate falling between two pipes drains downslope to one pipe, so the flow per meter of pipe equals the impingement rate times the pipe spacing, what is the maximum pipe spacing? Use a drainage capacity per unit width of q = θ·i.

Given
  • Geonet transmissivity θ = 2.5 × 10−4 m2/s
  • Slope i = 0.005
  • Reduction factor = 0.60
  • Leachate impingement rate = 2.0 mm/day
FindMaximum pipe spacing S (m)

Solution

Allowable flow per unit width must carry the leachate collected over the spacing (Solid waste: leachate collection).

q = θi = 2.5 × 10−4 m2/s × 0.005 × 86,400 s/day = 0.108 m3/(day·m)

qallow = 0.60 × 0.108 = 0.0648 m3/(day·m)

r·S ≤ qallow → S = 0.0648/0.0020 = 32.4 m

6,480 m leaves out the hydraulic gradient: 2.5 × 10−4 × 86,400 × 0.60/0.0020.
324 m enters the 0.5% slope as i = 0.05.
90.0 m divides by the reduction factor instead of multiplying: (0.108/0.60)/0.0020.
54.0 m ignores the 0.60 reduction factor: 0.108/0.0020.
q = θi = 2.5 × 10−4 × 0.005 × 86,400 = 0.108 m3/(day·m); × 0.60 = 0.0648; S = 0.0648/0.0020 = 32.4 m.
Question 37 of 60 · Solid and Hazardous Waste · 7–11 items

A composite liner has four defects, each with an area of 1 cm2. For one defect, kd = 1.0 × 10−4 m/s, h = 1.0 m, and Leff = 0.005 m, with Qdefect ≈ kdAd(h/Leff). The total annual infiltration reaching the liner is 20,000 m3/yr. Estimate the leachate collection efficiency.

Given
  • Number of defects = 4
  • Defect area Ad = 1 cm2 each
  • kd = 1.0 × 10−4 m/s
  • Head h = 1.0 m
  • Leff = 0.005 m
  • Annual infiltration = 20,000 m3/yr
FindLeachate collection efficiency (%)

Solution

Leakage through liner defects by Darcy's law, compared with the water reaching the liner (Solid waste: liner performance).

Qdefect = kdAd(h/Leff) = 1.0 × 10−4 × 1.0 × 10−4 × 200 = 2.0 × 10−6 m3/s = 63 m3/yr

η = 1 − (4 × 63)/20,000 = 98.7%

Per defect Q = 10−4 × 10−4 × (1.0/0.005) = 2.0 × 10−6 m3/s = 63 m3/yr; four leak 252 m3/yr; efficiency = 1 − 252/20,000 = 98.7%.
100.0% leaves out the gradient h/Leff = 200, which makes the leakage negligible.
99.7% counts one defect; the liner has four.
87.4% reads Leff as 0.0005 m, which makes each defect leak ten times more.
1.3% is the leakage as a share of infiltration; the collection efficiency is 100% minus that.
Question 38 of 60 · Mathematics · 5–8 items

Given the data points (0, 0), (1, 2), and (2, 8), determine the coefficient of the x2 term in the Newton divided-difference interpolating polynomial.

Given
  • Data points (0, 0), (1, 2), (2, 8)
FindCoefficient of the x2 term

Solution

The x2 coefficient of the quadratic Newton polynomial is the second divided difference (Mathematics: interpolation).

f[x0, x1] = (2 − 0)/1 = 2; f[x1, x2] = (8 − 2)/1 = 6

f[x0, x1, x2] = (6 − 2)/(2 − 0) = 2

8.0 is the data value f(2).
6.0 is the first divided difference f[x1, x2], not the second.
4.0 is the difference of the first divided differences (6 − 2) before dividing by x2 − x0 = 2.
f[x0, x1] = 2, f[x1, x2] = 6, so f[x0, x1, x2] = (6 − 2)/(2 − 0) = 2.0; the second divided difference is the x2 coefficient.
0.0 is the coefficient of the x term once the Newton polynomial 2x + 2x(x − 1) is expanded to 2x2, not the x2 coefficient.
Question 39 of 60 · Probability and Statistics · 4–6 items

A remediation pilot study reports contaminant concentrations (mg/L) at five wells before and after treatment. The paired data (Before, After) are: (10, 9), (12, 14), (15, 11), (20, 15), and (18, 18). Calculate the Wilcoxon signed-rank test statistic, W, using differences defined as d = Before - After and summing the signed ranks.

Given
  • Paired data (Before, After) = (10, 9), (12, 14), (15, 11), (20, 15), (18, 18) mg/L
  • d = Before − After
FindWilcoxon statistic W

Solution

Wilcoxon signed-rank: drop zero differences, rank |d|, attach signs, sum (Probability and statistics: nonparametric tests).

d = 1, −2, 4, 5 (one zero dropped) → ranks 1, 2, 3, 4

W = +1 − 2 + 3 + 4 = 6

−6 defines the differences as After − Before; the stem fixes d = Before − After.
2 is W−, the sum of the negative ranks only.
d = +1, −2, +4, +5 (the zero is dropped); ranks of |d| are 1, 2, 3, 4; signed sum = 1 − 2 + 3 + 4 = 6.
8 is W+, the sum of the positive ranks only, not the signed sum.
10 adds all ranks and ignores their signs.
Question 40 of 60 · Engineering Economics · 5–8 items

A project requires a $10,000 investment in depreciable assets with a 4-year class life and no salvage value. The project generates $5,000 in annual real pre-tax savings. The real minimum attractive rate of return (MARR) is 5%, inflation is 5%, and the tax rate is 40%. Using straight-line depreciation, calculate the after-tax present worth.

Given
  • Investment = $10,000
  • Class life = 4 years, no salvage, straight-line
  • Annual real pre-tax savings = $5,000
  • Real MARR = 5 %
  • Inflation = 5 %
  • Tax rate = 40 %
FindAfter-tax present worth ($)

Solution

Discount real cash flows at the real rate and nominal ones (the depreciation shield) at the nominal rate (Engineering economics: inflation and taxes).

inominal = 1.05 × 1.05 − 1 = 10.25%

PW = 5,000(1 − 0.40)(P/A, 5%, 4) + 0.40 × 2,500(P/A, 10.25%, 4) − 10,000

PW = 10,638 + 3,153 − 10,000 = $3,791

$4,184 discounts the depreciation shield at the real rate; depreciation is fixed in nominal dollars, so it takes the nominal rate (10.25%).
$2,611 discounts the real after-tax savings at the nominal rate; real cash flows take the real MARR.
$13,791 forgets to subtract the $10,000 investment.
Real after-tax savings 3,000 × (P/A, 5%, 4) = 10,638; nominal shield 1,000 × (P/A, 10.25%, 4) = 3,153; PW = 10,638 + 3,153 − 10,000 = $3,791.
$638 leaves out the depreciation tax shield entirely.
Question 41 of 60 · Surface Water Resources and Hydrology · 9–14 items

A 200-acre watershed has the hydrologic characteristics listed below. Using the SCS Curve Number method and the standard SCS unit hydrograph peak discharge equation (qp = (484 A Q)/Tp), calculate the peak flow of the direct runoff hydrograph for the design storm.

ParameterValue
Watershed Area200 acres
Curve Number (CN)80
Time to Peak (Tp)2.0 hours
Design Storm Rainfall (P)5.0 inches
Given
  • Watershed area = 200 acres
  • Curve number CN = 80
  • Time to peak Tp = 2.0 h
  • Design rainfall P = 5.0 in
FindPeak direct runoff qp (cfs)

Solution

Curve-number runoff depth, then the SCS unit-hydrograph peak with A in mi2 (Hydrology: NRCS method).

S = 1000/80 − 10 = 2.5 in; Ia = 0.5 in; Q = (5.0 − 0.5)2/(5.0 − 0.5 + 2.5) = 2.89 in

qp = 484AQ/Tp = 484 × 0.3125 mi2 × 2.89 in / 2.0 h = 219 cfs

S = 2.5 in, Ia = 0.5 in, Q = 4.52/7.0 = 2.89 in; qp = 484 × (200/640) mi2 × 2.89 in / 2.0 h = 219 cfs.
252 cfs drops the initial abstraction, Q = P2/(P + S) = 3.33 in.
340 cfs uses P − Ia = 4.5 in as the runoff depth and leaves out the retention S.
378 cfs uses all 5.0 in of rainfall as runoff.
567 cfs converts 200 acres to km2 (0.809) instead of mi2 (0.3125); the 484 factor needs square miles.
Question 42 of 60 · Surface Water Resources and Hydrology · 9–14 items

A lake with a volume of 1.0 × 107 m3 receives an external phosphorus load of 2,000 kg/yr. The outflow rate is 5.0 × 106 m3 yr−1 and the phosphorus settling rate constant is 0.40 yr−1. If the steady-state phosphorus concentration is 0.30 mg/L, what is the estimated internal phosphorus loading rate from sediment release?

Given
  • Lake volume V = 1.0 × 107 m3
  • External P load = 2,000 kg/yr
  • Outflow Q = 5.0 × 106 m3/yr
  • Settling rate k = 0.40 yr−1
  • Steady-state P = 0.30 mg/L
FindInternal P loading (kg/yr)

Solution

Steady-state lake mass balance: inputs = outflow + settling (Surface water: lake models).

Wint = C(Q + kV) − Wext

Wint = 0.0003 kg/m3 × (5.0 × 106 + 0.40 × 1.0 × 107) m3/yr − 2,000 kg/yr = 700 kg/yr

4,700 kg/yr adds the external load to the losses instead of subtracting it.
2,700 kg/yr is the total loss; the 2,000 kg/yr external load still has to be subtracted.
1,500 kg/yr is the outflow loss alone.
1,200 kg/yr is the settling loss alone.
Losses at 0.30 mg/L: outflow 5.0 × 106 × 0.0003 = 1,500 kg/yr, settling 0.40 × 107 × 0.0003 = 1,200 kg/yr; 2,700 − 2,000 external = 700 kg/yr.
Question 43 of 60 · Groundwater, Soils, and Sediments · 8–12 items

A well fully penetrates a confined aquifer and is pumped at a steady rate of 2.5 m3/min. Drawdowns observed at distances of 30 m and 120 m from the well are 4.5 m and 1.2 m, respectively. The transmissivity of the aquifer is most nearly:

Given
  • Pumping rate Q = 2.5 m3/min
  • Drawdown s1 = 4.5 m at r1 = 30 m
  • Drawdown s2 = 1.2 m at r2 = 120 m
FindTransmissivity T (m2/day)

Solution

Thiem equation with two observation wells (Groundwater: well hydraulics).

Q = 2.5 m3/min × 1,440 min/day = 3,600 m3/day

T = Q·ln(r2/r1)/[2π(s1 − s2)] = 3,600 × ln(120/30)/(2π × 3.3) = 241 m2/day

Q = 2.5 × 1,440 = 3,600 m3/day; T = Q·ln(r2/r1)/[2π(s1 − s2)] = 3,600 × ln 4/(2π × 3.3) = 241 m2/day.
481 m2/day divides by π instead of 2π.
1,510 m2/day leaves out the 2π.
105 m2/day uses log10(r2/r1) instead of the natural log.
139 m2/day adds the drawdowns; the Thiem equation uses their difference, s1 − s2 = 3.3 m.
Question 44 of 60 · Air Quality and Control · 8–12 items

A facility with 4,000 m3/h of supply air (15% outdoor air) generates 2,100 mg/h of particulates. The outdoor concentration is 0.20 mg/m3. Filtration treats only the recirculated air. To keep the indoor concentration at or below 1.0 mg/m3, select the most economical filter.

ModelEfficiencyInstalled Cost
F-2525%$120
F-3030%$150
F-4545%$220
F-6565%$290
F-8585%$350
Given
  • Supply air Q = 4,000 m3/h
  • Outdoor air fraction = 15%
  • Particulate generation G = 2,100 mg/h
  • Outdoor concentration Cout = 0.20 mg/m3
  • Indoor limit Cin = 1.0 mg/m3
FindMost economical filter

Solution

Steady-state room balance with filtered recirculation (Air quality: indoor air).

G + QoaCout + Qrec(1 − η)Cin = QtotalCin

2,100 + 600 × 0.20 + 3,400(1 − η) = 4,000 → η = 1,620/3,400 = 47.6% → F-65

Balance: 2,100 + 600 × 0.20 + 3,400(1 − η)(1.0) = 4,000 × 1.0 gives η = 47.6%; F-65 is the cheapest filter above that.
F-30 removes only 30% of the recirculated load; the balance needs η ≥ 47.6%, so the room would stay above 1.0 mg/m3.
F-85 also meets the limit, but it costs $60 more than F-65, which is already sufficient.
F-25 (25%) is far below the 47.6% the recirculated air must have removed.
F-45 (45%) is just short of the 47.6% needed; it would pass only if the 0.20 mg/m3 brought in with outdoor air were ignored.
Question 45 of 60 · Water and Wastewater · 12–18 items

A facility needs 15 m3/d of process water (TDS ≤ 80 mg/L) produced by blending rainwater membrane permeate (TDS 10 mg/L, 75% recovery) with well water (TDS 350 mg/L). Annual rainfall is 1,100 mm (C = 0.85). The required roof catchment area is most nearly:

Given
  • Process water demand = 15 m3/d
  • Target TDS ≤ 80 mg/L
  • Permeate TDS = 10 mg/L
  • Membrane recovery = 75 %
  • Well water TDS = 350 mg/L
  • Annual rainfall = 1,100 mm
  • Runoff coefficient C = 0.85
FindRequired roof catchment area (m2)

Solution

Blend mass balance → permeate → membrane feed → roof area (Water resources: alternative supplies).

15 × 80 = 10Qp + 350(15 − Qp) → Qp = 11.9 m3/d

Qfeed = 11.9/0.75 = 15.9 m3/d = 5,800 m3/yr

A = 5,800 m3/yr ÷ (1.1 m/yr × 0.85) = 6,200 m2

3,490 m2 multiplies the permeate by the 75% recovery instead of dividing; the membrane needs more feed than it delivers.
4,650 m2 sizes the roof for the permeate flow and ignores the 25% of feed lost to concentrate.
5,270 m2 leaves out the runoff coefficient C = 0.85.
Blend: 15 × 80 = 10Qp + 350(15 − Qp) → Qp = 11.9 m3/d; feed = 11.9/0.75 = 15.9 m3/d = 5,800 m3/yr; area = 5,800/(1.1 × 0.85) = 6,200 m2.
7,810 m2 makes all 15 m3/d from permeate; blending with well water lets part of the demand bypass the membrane.
Question 46 of 60 · Air Quality and Control · 8–12 items
ConditionStabilityσy (m)σz (m)Plume Rise Δh (m)
Strong InsolationA1108030
Overcast/NeutralD402015
Clear NightF20105

A facility emits 80 g/s of sulfur dioxide from a stack with physical height h = 40 m. The wind speed is 3 m/s at stack height. Using the dispersion parameters in the table, calculate the centerline ground-level concentration at x = 500 m for the worst-case meteorological condition.

Given
  • SO2 emission rate Q = 80 g/s
  • Physical stack height h = 40 m
  • Wind speed u = 3 m/s
  • Downwind distance x = 500 m
  • Class A: σy = 110 m
  • Class A: σz = 80 m
  • Class A: plume rise Δh = 30 m
  • Class D: σy = 40 m
  • Class D: σz = 20 m
  • Class D: plume rise Δh = 15 m
  • Class F: σy = 20 m
  • Class F: σz = 10 m
  • Class F: plume rise Δh = 5 m
FindWorst-case centerline ground-level concentration (μg/m3)

Solution

Ground-level centerline Gaussian plume with reflection, evaluated for each stability class (Air quality: atmospheric dispersion).

C(x, 0, 0) = [Q/(πuσyσz)]·exp[−H2/(2σz2)]

A: H = 70 m → 80/(π × 3 × 110 × 80) × e−0.383 = 658 µg/m3; D: 242 µg/m3; F: 1.70 µg/m3

worst case = class A, 658 µg/m3

852 µg/m3 uses the physical stack height (40 m) and ignores the 30 m plume rise.
242 µg/m3 is the neutral class D result, which is lower than class A at this distance.
329 µg/m3 uses Q/(2πuσyσz) at ground level and drops the ground-reflection term, which doubles the concentration at z = 0.
1.70 µg/m3 is the stable class F result; at 500 m the narrow plume has not yet reached the ground.
Class A, H = 40 + 30 = 70 m: C = [80/(π × 3 × 110 × 80)] × e−702/(2 × 802) = 9.65 × 10−4 × 0.682 g/m3 = 658 µg/m3.
Question 47 of 60 · Air Quality and Control · 8–12 items

An electrostatic precipitator (ESP) is designed to treat a gas flow of 60 m3/s with an effective drift velocity of 0.12 m s−1. The inlet particulate loading is 5,000 kg/day, and the outlet emissions must not exceed 50 kg/day. The required collection plate area is most nearly:

Given
  • Gas flow Q = 60 m3/s
  • Effective drift velocity w = 0.12 m/s
  • Inlet particulate loading = 5,000 kg/day
  • Allowed outlet emissions = 50 kg/day
FindRequired collection plate area A (m2)

Solution

Deutsch–Anderson solved for plate area (Air quality: electrostatic precipitators).

η = (5,000 − 50)/5,000 = 0.99

A = −(Q/w)·ln(1 − η) = (60 m3/s ÷ 0.12 m/s) × 4.61 = 2,300 m2

5.03 m2 takes −ln(η) = −ln(0.99) instead of −ln(1 − η) = −ln(0.01).
495 m2 multiplies Q/w by the efficiency 0.99 instead of by −ln(1 − η).
1,000 m2 uses log10(1/0.01) = 2 instead of the natural log, 4.61.
1,150 m2 halves the area as if each plate counted twice; A in the Deutsch equation is the total collecting area.
Required η = (5,000 − 50)/5,000 = 0.99; A = −(Q/w)ln(1 − η) = (60/0.12) × 4.61 = 2,300 m2.
Question 48 of 60 · Air Quality and Control · 8–12 items
ParameterMeasured Value
NOx concentration (dry)45 ppmvd
Oxygen concentration (dry)3.0%
F-factor (dry)8,710 dscf/MMBtu
NO2 molecular weight46.01 lb/lbmol

A natural-gas-fired boiler stack test measures NOx at 45 ppmvd (parts per million by volume, dry) at an oxygen concentration of 3.0% (dry). Using EPA Method 19 and the data provided, calculate the NOx emission rate in lb/MMBtu (as NO2). The standard molar volume is 385.3 dscf/lbmol at 68 °F.

Given
  • NOx concentration (dry) = 45 ppmvd
  • Oxygen concentration (dry) = 3.0%
  • F-factor (dry) Fd = 8,710 dscf/MMBtu
  • NO2 molecular weight = 46.01 lb/lbmol
  • Standard molar volume = 385.3 dscf/lbmol
FindNOx emission rate (lb/MMBtu)

Solution

EPA Method 19 heat-input emission rate (Air quality: emission measurement).

Cd = 45 × 10−6 × 46.01 lb/lbmol ÷ 385.3 dscf/lbmol = 5.37 × 10−6 lb/dscf

E = Cd·Fd·20.9/(20.9 − %O2) = 5.37 × 10−6 × 8,710 × 20.9/17.9 = 0.055 lb/MMBtu

0.031 lb/MMBtu uses the molar mass of NO (30) and also leaves out the oxygen correction, two errors at once.
0.036 lb/MMBtu uses the molar mass of NO (30) instead of NO2 (46.01); NOx is reported as NO2.
0.040 lb/MMBtu inverts the oxygen correction (17.9/20.9).
0.047 lb/MMBtu leaves out the oxygen correction 20.9/(20.9 − %O2).
Cd = 45 × 10−6 × 46.01/385.3 = 5.37 × 10−6 lb/dscf; E = CdFd × 20.9/(20.9 − 3.0) = 5.37 × 10−6 × 8,710 × 1.168 = 0.055 lb/MMBtu.
Question 49 of 60 · Mathematics · 5–8 items

When using finite difference methods to numerically approximate the derivative of a thermodynamic property, decreasing the step size (h) initially improves accuracy. However, if h becomes extremely small, the total computed error begins to increase. Which of the following best explains this phenomenon?

Solution

Total error = truncation (∝ hp) + round-off (∝ εmachine/h); the sum has a minimum at an optimal h (Mathematics: numerical methods).

No matrix is inverted in a difference quotient, and a well-conditioned problem has a condition number near 1, not 0.
A finite-difference derivative is a direct formula, not an optimization, so there is no local minimum to get trapped in.
Changing h does not turn an explicit difference formula into an implicit one.
Truncation error keeps shrinking with h (as h or h2); it does not reverse at small steps.
Truncation error falls as h shrinks, but the difference f(x + h) − f(x) loses significant digits; that round-off error grows roughly as 1/h and eventually dominates.
Question 50 of 60 · Environmental Chemistry · 7–11 items

In a batch test with excess substrate, a bacterial culture grows exponentially at a specific growth rate μ = 0.30 h−1. How long does the biomass take to rise from 50 mg/L to 400 mg/L?

Given
  • Initial biomass X0 = 50 mg/L
  • Final biomass X = 400 mg/L
  • Specific growth rate μ = 0.30 h−1
FindTime t (h)

Solution

Exponential (unlimited) growth in batch (Environmental chemistry: microbiology).

t = ln(X/X0)/μ = ln(8)/0.30 h−1 = 6.93 h

2.31 h is one doubling time (ln 2/μ); the biomass must double three times to go from 50 to 400 mg/L.
3.01 h uses log10(8) instead of the natural log.
X = X0eμt → t = ln(400/50)/0.30 = 2.079/0.30 = 6.93 h (three doublings of 2.31 h).
23.3 h assumes linear growth at the initial rate (350/(0.30 × 50)).
26.7 h divides the ratio 8 by μ instead of its natural log.
Question 51 of 60 · Environmental Chemistry · 7–11 items

A wastewater contains 300 mg/L of glucose (C6H12O6, molar mass 180 g/mol). Assuming complete oxidation C6H12O6 + 6O2 → 6CO2 + 6H2O, what is its theoretical oxygen demand?

Given
  • Glucose = 300 mg/L
  • Molar mass of glucose = 180 g/mol
  • Molar mass of O2 = 32 g/mol
FindTheoretical oxygen demand (mg/L)

Solution

Oxygen required by stoichiometry (Environmental chemistry: oxygen demand).

ThOD = C × (6 × 32 g O2)/(180 g glucose) = 300 × 1.067 = 320 mg/L

53.3 mg/L uses one O2 per glucose; the balanced equation needs six.
160 mg/L counts 6 oxygen atoms (96 g) per mole of glucose instead of 6 O2 molecules (192 g).
281 mg/L inverts the mass ratio (180/192 instead of 192/180).
300 mg/L assumes one gram of oxygen per gram of glucose.
ThOD = 300 mg/L × (6 × 32)/180 = 300 × 1.067 = 320 mg/L.
Question 52 of 60 · Solid and Hazardous Waste · 7–11 items

A composting facility blends dewatered biosolids (dry basis: 30% C, 5.0% N) with sawdust (dry basis: 50% C, 0.20% N). How many kilograms of dry sawdust are needed per kilogram of dry biosolids to reach a blended C:N ratio of 25?

Given
  • Biosolids: C = 30%, N = 5.0% (dry)
  • Sawdust: C = 50%, N = 0.20% (dry)
  • Target C:N = 25
FindDry sawdust per kg dry biosolids (kg)

Solution

Blend by mass balance on carbon and nitrogen, then set the ratio (Solid waste: composting).

C:N = (0.30 + 0.50x)/(0.050 + 0.0020x) = 25

0.30 + 0.50x = 1.25 + 0.050x → x = 2.11 kg sawdust per kg biosolids

2.78 kg ignores the carbon already supplied by the biosolids.
(0.30 + 0.50x)/(0.050 + 0.0020x) = 25 → 0.30 + 0.50x = 1.25 + 0.050x → x = 0.95/0.45 = 2.11 kg.
1.90 kg ignores the small nitrogen content of the sawdust.
0.47 kg is the inverse, kilograms of biosolids per kilogram of sawdust.
0.084 kg averages the C:N ratios themselves (6 and 250); ratios do not blend linearly by mass.
Question 53 of 60 · Fundamental Principles · 7–11 items

Stream A (Q = 2 MGD, BOD = 50 mg/L) mixes with Stream B (Q = 3 MGD, BOD = 10 mg/L). The combined flow enters a plug flow reactor with a volume of 0.5 MG and a decay coefficient k = 2.5 d−1. Calculate the effluent BOD concentration.

Given
  • Stream A: Q = 2 MGD, BOD = 50 mg/L
  • Stream B: Q = 3 MGD, BOD = 10 mg/L
  • Reactor volume V = 0.5 MG
  • Decay coefficient k = 2.5 d−1
FindEffluent BOD (mg/L)

Solution

Flow-weighted blend, then first-order decay in plug flow (Fundamental principles: mass balance and reactors).

Cin = (2 × 50 + 3 × 10)/(2 + 3) = 26 mg/L; τ = V/Q = 0.5/5 = 0.10 d

C = Cine−kτ = 26 × e−0.25 = 20.2 mg/L

14.6 mg/L applies the decay with base 10 (10−kτ) instead of e.
17.1 mg/L computes the residence time with stream B's 3 MGD only; both streams pass through the reactor.
Blend: (2 × 50 + 3 × 10)/5 = 26 mg/L; τ = 0.5/5 = 0.10 d; C = 26e−2.5 × 0.10 = 20.2 mg/L.
23.4 mg/L averages the two BOD values (30 mg/L) without weighting by flow before applying the decay.
26.0 mg/L is the blended influent; the reactor still removes BOD.
Question 54 of 60 · Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulics · 12–18 items

A rectangular barge is 20 m long and 12 m wide and floats with a draft of 2.5 m in seawater. Its center of gravity G is 3.0 m above the keel. Calculate the metacentric height GM for rolling (about the long axis).

Given
  • Length L = 20 m
  • Width W = 12 m
  • Draft = 2.5 m
  • KG = 3.0 m
FindMetacentric height GM (m)

Solution

Initial stability of a floating body: GM = KB + BM − KG with BM = I/V about the longitudinal axis (Fluid mechanics: buoyancy and stability).

KB = 2.5/2 = 1.25 m; I = LW3/12 = 20 × 123/12 = 2,880 m4; V = 20 × 12 × 2.5 = 600 m3

BM = 2,880/600 = 4.80 m; GM = 1.25 + 4.80 − 3.0 = 3.05 m

1.80 m drops KB and takes GM = BM − KG = 4.80 − 3.0.
KB = 2.5/2 = 1.25 m; BM = I/V = (20 × 123/12)/(20 × 12 × 2.5) = 2,880/600 = 4.80 m; GM = 1.25 + 4.80 − 3.0 = 3.05 m.
4.30 m puts the center of buoyancy at the full draft (2.5 m) instead of half of it.
6.05 m is KM = KB + BM, the height of the metacenter; KG = 3.0 m must still be subtracted.
11.6 m takes the moment of inertia about the wrong axis, I = W·L3/12, which governs pitch, not roll.
Question 55 of 60 · Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulics · 12–18 items

A pressure gauge on a process tank at a high-altitude site reads a vacuum of 22 kPa. The local atmospheric pressure is 94 kPa. What is the absolute pressure in the tank?

Given
  • Gauge reading = 22 kPa vacuum
  • Local atmospheric pressure = 94 kPa
FindAbsolute pressure (kPa)

Solution

Absolute pressure = local atmospheric + gauge, with a vacuum counted as negative gauge (Fluid mechanics: pressure).

Pabs = Patm + Pgauge = 94 kPa + (−22 kPa) = 72 kPa

A vacuum gauge reads below local atmospheric, so Pabs = Patm − Pvac = 94 − 22 = 72 kPa.
79 kPa subtracts the vacuum from standard atmospheric pressure (101.3 kPa) instead of the local 94 kPa.
94 kPa is the local atmospheric pressure; it ignores the 22 kPa vacuum.
116 kPa adds the vacuum to the atmospheric pressure; a vacuum is a negative gauge pressure.
123 kPa adds the vacuum to standard atmospheric pressure, two errors at once.
Question 56 of 60 · Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulics · 12–18 items

A hydraulic jump forms in a wide rectangular channel carrying a unit discharge q = 4.00 m2/s. The depth just upstream of the jump is 0.60 m. Using g = 9.81 m/s2, compute the energy loss across the jump.

Given
  • Unit discharge q = 4.00 m2/s
  • Upstream depth y1 = 0.60 m
  • g = 9.81 m/s2
FindEnergy loss across the jump ΔE (m)

Solution

Sequent depth from the momentum equation, then the head loss across the jump (Hydraulics: hydraulic jump).

Fr12 = V12/(gy1) = (6.67)2/(9.81 × 0.60) = 7.55

y2 = (y1/2)[√(1 + 8Fr12) − 1] = 2.05 m

ΔE = (y2 − y1)3/(4y1y2) = (1.45)3/(4 × 0.60 × 2.05) = 0.621 m

0.057 m uses the Froude number instead of its square in the sequent-depth equation, so y2 comes out too small (1.14 m).
Fr12 = (4.00/0.60)2/(9.81 × 0.60) = 7.55; y2 = (0.60/2)[√(1 + 8 × 7.55) − 1] = 2.05 m; ΔE = (2.05 − 0.60)3/(4 × 0.60 × 2.05) = 0.621 m.
1.451 m is the rise in depth, y2 − y1, not the energy lost.
2.482 m leaves the 4 out of ΔE = (y2 − y1)3/(4y1y2).
2.865 m is the specific energy before the jump, E1 = y1 + q2/(2gy12), not the loss.
Question 57 of 60 · Groundwater, Soils, and Sediments · 8–12 items

An in-situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) pilot test treats a saturated aquifer volume of 200 m3. The aquifer has a porosity of 0.25, a soil bulk density of 1,600 kg m−3, and a Natural Oxidant Demand (NOD) of 1.5 g/kg. The groundwater contains 20 mg/L of TCE. The stoichiometric oxidant demand for TCE is 3.0 g oxidant per 1.0 g TCE. What is the minimum total mass of oxidant required to satisfy both the contaminant and soil demands?

Given
  • Treated aquifer volume = 200 m3
  • Porosity n = 0.25
  • Bulk density = 1,600 kg/m3
  • Natural oxidant demand = 1.5 g/kg
  • TCE in groundwater = 20 mg/L
  • Stoichiometric demand = 3.0 g oxidant/g TCE
FindMinimum total oxidant mass (kg)

Solution

Oxidant dose = contaminant stoichiometric demand + natural oxidant demand of the soil (Groundwater: remediation).

TCE = 200 m3 × 0.25 × 20 g/m3 = 1.0 kg → 3.0 kg oxidant

NOD = 200 m3 × 1,600 kg/m3 × 1.5 g/kg = 480 kg

total = 483 kg

3 kg covers only the TCE (1.0 kg × 3.0); the soil's natural oxidant demand is far larger.
363 kg multiplies the bulk density by the solids fraction (1 − 0.25); bulk density already refers to the whole soil volume.
480 kg is the natural oxidant demand alone, without the 3 kg for TCE.
Pore water = 200 × 0.25 = 50 m3, TCE = 50,000 L × 20 mg/L = 1.0 kg → 3.0 kg oxidant; soil = 200 × 1,600 = 320,000 kg × 1.5 g/kg = 480 kg; total 483 kg.
492 kg puts 20 mg/L of TCE in the whole 200 m3 instead of only the 50 m3 of pore water.
Question 58 of 60 · Groundwater, Soils, and Sediments · 8–12 items

A Permeable Reactive Barrier (PRB) is designed to treat groundwater with a seepage velocity of 0.2 m/day. The influent concentration is 100 mg/L and the regulatory limit is 1.0 mg/L. If the reaction follows first-order kinetics with a rate constant k = 0.5 day−1, what is the minimum required thickness of the barrier?

Given
  • Seepage velocity v = 0.2 m/day
  • Influent concentration = 100 mg/L
  • Regulatory limit = 1.0 mg/L
  • Rate constant k = 0.5 day−1
FindMinimum barrier thickness (m)

Solution

Residence time for first-order decay to the limit, then thickness = seepage velocity × time (Groundwater: permeable reactive barriers).

t = ln(C0/C)/k = ln(100/1.0)/0.5 day−1 = 9.21 days

L = v·t = 0.2 m/day × 9.21 days = 1.84 m

0.396 m treats the decay as linear: (1 − 0.01)/0.5 days × 0.2 m/day.
0.800 m uses log10(100) = 2 instead of ln(100) = 4.61.
Required residence time t = ln(100/1.0)/0.5 = 9.21 days; thickness = v·t = 0.2 × 9.21 = 1.84 m.
9.21 is the residence time in days; it still has to be multiplied by the 0.2 m/day velocity.
46.1 m divides the residence time by the velocity instead of multiplying.
Question 59 of 60 · Air Quality and Control · 8–12 items

A continuous emission monitoring system measures NOx at 36 ppmv on a wet basis. The stack gas contains 10% moisture by volume, and the regulatory limit is specified on a dry basis. What is the dry-basis NOx concentration?

Given
  • Wet-basis NOx = 36 ppmv
  • Moisture = 10% by volume
FindDry-basis NOx (ppmv)

Solution

Wet-to-dry correction removes the water vapor from the gas volume (Air quality: stack measurements).

Cdry = Cwet/(1 − Bws) = 36/(1 − 0.10) = 40.0 ppmv

32.4 ppmv multiplies by the dry fraction (36 × 0.90) instead of dividing.
32.7 ppmv divides by 1 + 0.10 instead of 1 − 0.10.
36.0 ppmv leaves the reading on the wet basis.
39.6 ppmv multiplies by 1.10 instead of dividing by 0.90.
Removing the 10% water vapor leaves 90% of the gas: Cdry = 36/(1 − 0.10) = 40.0 ppmv.
Question 60 of 60 · Energy and Environment · 4–6 items

Water use data for two power plants is provided below: Plant A: Withdrawal = 40,000 gal/MWh; Consumption = 300 gal/MWh Plant B: Withdrawal = 800 gal/MWh; Consumption = 600 gal/MWh Based on these ratios, which statement correctly identifies the cooling system types?

Solution

Once-through: high withdrawal, low consumption; recirculating (wet tower): low withdrawal, most of it evaporated (Energy and environment: water use).

A: 300/40,000 < 1% consumed; B: 600/800 = 75% consumed

This reverses them: a recirculating tower would not need 40,000 gal/MWh of withdrawal.
Once-through systems withdraw huge volumes and return almost all (A consumes under 1%); recirculating towers withdraw little but evaporate most of it (B consumes 75%).
Plant A returns more than 99% of what it withdraws, the signature of once-through cooling.
Plant B consumes 75% of its withdrawal, which only an evaporative recirculating system does.
Dry (air) cooling consumes almost no water, but Plant B consumes 600 gal/MWh.

Answer every question to see your score

Pace it like exam day

The real exam gives you 5 h 20 min for 110 questions, a little under 3 minutes each. At exam speed the set fills close to 3 hours. Do it in two sittings, as the exam does: its break is 25 min, after about half the questions.

Keep the FE Reference Handbook open in a second window and look up every formula instead of recalling it. Search speed counts on exam day.

This practice exam and the NCEES one

This set is independent of NCEES, which sells its own practice exams (2 × 50 questions, $50 each), built on the same July 2020 specification. The real exam also uses alternative item types (multiple correct, point and click, drag and drop, fill in the blank); this set is multiple choice.

Section pages for this exam

Practice for other disciplines

Practice exam, quick answers

Is there an FE Environmental practice exam PDF?

The NCEES practice exams are interactive products in its online store, not PDFs. Problem sets that circulate as PDFs are often older; check that their topics match the 15 areas of the specifications in force since July 2020.

How long is the real FE Environmental exam?

5 h 20 min of testing for 110 questions, a few of them unscored pretest items, inside an appointment of 6 h.

How close is this to the real exam?

The topics and their proportions follow the current specification; most problems here are calculations. The exam's own items are confidential, so no independent set, this one included, reproduces them.

Water-to-waste practice on your phone

FE Environmental questions, answers and worked solutions in a study app.

Not affiliated with NCEES.